Re: (still not off list) Re: enforcement first, ask questions later?

[Pierre-Elliott Bécue <becue@crans.org>]

Le 6 février 2019 10:09:11 GMT+01:00, "Pierre-Elliott Bécue" <peb@debian.org> a écrit :
>Le 6 février 2019 09:58:34 GMT+01:00, Daniel Pocock <daniel@pocock.pro>
>a écrit :
>>On 06/02/2019 08:54, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
>>> Le mercredi 06 février 2019 à 09:51:45+0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue a
>>écrit :
>>>> Le mercredi 06 février 2019 à 08:42:13+0000, Daniel Pocock a
>écrit :
>>>>> On 04/02/2019 22:52, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
>>>>>> Do you really think that among more than a thousand people,
>nobody
>>>>>> except the two recently expelled developers made an innocent
>>mistake? Do
>>>>>> you actually think that regarding the one whom I replied to, he's
>>on any
>>>>>> "innocent mistake" path?
>>>>>
>>>>> That is extraordinarily offensive and defamatory
>>>>>
>>>>> Many people noticed that your statement makes the implication that
>>there
>>>>> may have been wrongdoing while providing absolutely no evidence
>>>>> thereof.  The only evidence that has appeared is about dirty
>>politics
>>>>> and backstabbing.
>>>>>
>>>>> This proves my point about rampant character assassination[1] in
>>Debian,
>>>>> thank you for proving that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please kindly provide a public apology and retraction of your
>>statement.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2018/12/msg00042.html
>>>> I'm pretty sure I told you to not reply to me as I would not bother
>>to
>>>> reply.
>>>>
>>>> Please kindly comply with my requirement.
>>>>
>>>> And stop behaving like my neighbour's child. Some introspection
>>would be
>>>> a good thing.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>> For the sake of clarity, I shall disclose any private email you send
>>to
>>> me. I don't want to have any private discussion with you. This is
>not
>>> negotiable.
>>>
>>
>>OK, thank you for also helping demonstrate that there is no one person
>>to be blamed for the confrontational attitudes in this community, it
>>appears to be a deep rooted and pervasive problem in organizational
>>culture.
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Daniel
>
>You are on a good path to prove my "not on an innocent mistake path"
>point.
>
>This was my last reply. 
>
>Best regards.

I changed my mind. No more email from Pocock will end en on this list through me. I don't want to give him a tribune.

Sorry for the noise, and have a nice day, all !

Cheers, 
-- 
PEB