Re: (still not off list) Re: enforcement first, ask questions later? (was: Re: (off list) Re: enforcement first, ask questions later?)
Le 6 février 2019 09:58:34 GMT+01:00, Daniel Pocock <daniel@pocock.pro> a écrit :
>On 06/02/2019 08:54, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
>> Le mercredi 06 février 2019 à 09:51:45+0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue a
>écrit :
>>> Le mercredi 06 février 2019 à 08:42:13+0000, Daniel Pocock a écrit :
>>>> On 04/02/2019 22:52, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
>>>>> Do you really think that among more than a thousand people, nobody
>>>>> except the two recently expelled developers made an innocent
>mistake? Do
>>>>> you actually think that regarding the one whom I replied to, he's
>on any
>>>>> "innocent mistake" path?
>>>>
>>>> That is extraordinarily offensive and defamatory
>>>>
>>>> Many people noticed that your statement makes the implication that
>there
>>>> may have been wrongdoing while providing absolutely no evidence
>>>> thereof. The only evidence that has appeared is about dirty
>politics
>>>> and backstabbing.
>>>>
>>>> This proves my point about rampant character assassination[1] in
>Debian,
>>>> thank you for proving that.
>>>>
>>>> Please kindly provide a public apology and retraction of your
>statement.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Daniel
>>>>
>>>> 1. https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2018/12/msg00042.html
>>> I'm pretty sure I told you to not reply to me as I would not bother
>to
>>> reply.
>>>
>>> Please kindly comply with my requirement.
>>>
>>> And stop behaving like my neighbour's child. Some introspection
>would be
>>> a good thing.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>> For the sake of clarity, I shall disclose any private email you send
>to
>> me. I don't want to have any private discussion with you. This is not
>> negotiable.
>>
>
>OK, thank you for also helping demonstrate that there is no one person
>to be blamed for the confrontational attitudes in this community, it
>appears to be a deep rooted and pervasive problem in organizational
>culture.
>
>Regards,
>
>Daniel
You are on a good path to prove my "not on an innocent mistake path" point.
This was my last reply.
Best regards.
--
PEB from my phone.
Reply to: