Re: Planet Debian revisions
On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 03:54:00PM +0000, Ulrike Uhlig wrote:
>Jonathan Carter:
>> Dear Planet administrators and debian-project
>>
>> Based on the very short amount of discussion we've had so far, I'd like
>> to make the following changes to https://wiki.debian.org/PlanetDebian
>>
>> I've scaled the wording down from what I originally suggested on
>> debian-project so that it doesn't include the term "smear campaign.
>
>Thanks for working on this!
>
>> Under the section "What Can I Post On Planet", I would like to add the
>> following points:
>>
>> """
>> 4. Avoid posting personal fights or insults. Planet Debian is not an
>> appropriate medium for this.
>
>> 5. Debian's community standards fully apply to Planet Debian, that
>> includes following [[https://www.debian.org/code_of_conduct|Debian's
>> Code of Conduct]].
>>
>> 6. Posts that are syndicated on Planet Debian that doesn't conform to
>
>"that don't" instead of "that doesn't"
+1
>> our community standards may result in removal of a post or even an
>> entire blog. In such a case, please reach out to the Planet
>
>"entire feed" ?
+1
>"In this case" instead of "In such a case" ?
>
>> administrators before re-adding your blog yourself.
>
>"before" or "instead" ?
"instead" is better, I think.
>> """
>
>It all sounds good.
Yup!
>> On #6 I was tempted to add "When a blog is removed, the committer should
>> add a comment listing the posts that resulted in it being removed", but
>> not sure if that's overloading it a bit too much.
>
>I think this is useful. Maybe "When a blog is removed, the committer
>must (or should?) state a reason for the removal. If unsure, please
>reach out to the Planet administrators."
Sounds good to me.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com
"Further comment on how I feel about IBM will appear once I've worked out
whether they're being malicious or incompetent. Capital letters are forecast."
Matthew Garrett, http://www.livejournal.com/users/mjg59/30675.html
Reply to: