Re: CoC / procedural abuse
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 10:04:19AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> If the complaint warrants a ban or warning, the opinions of other
> listmasters is canvassed for a short period of time, and if there are no
> objections, the action proceeds. If anything more than a warning occurs, it
> is announced on debian-private@, which enables Debian Developers to review
> the actions that listmaster@ has taken, and override them via GR.
Alright. Thank you. I would like to see some public process for review
machinery, and I'd like to see a requirement that rather than "no objections"
there be a quorum for a banning decision, but that these actions are recorded
in debian-private seems sufficient.
> Mailing list bans are not done in public to avoid harming the reputation
> of the individuals banned. If the individual in question wants the ban
> to be disclosed publicly, they can email listmaster@, and we will do so.
I'll pass this along. It seems reasonable.
Thanks.
--
Mason Loring Bliss mason@blisses.org Ewige Blumenkraft!
(if awake 'sleep (aref #(sleep dream) (random 2))) -- Hamlet, Act III, Scene I
Reply to: