Re: GR proposal: code of conduct
- To: debian-project@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: GR proposal: code of conduct
- From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 21:52:15 +0800
- Message-id: <CAKTje6EkKBe0g+DV1Pgr2020MRCM+2yVfO9xgu7=YSdfVj6fMg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <20140301113748.GA8971@bryant.redmars.org>
- References: <28105346.19671392226206329.JavaMail.root@newmail.brainfood.com> <24545501.20871392227105291.JavaMail.root@newmail.brainfood.com> <20140212214804.GA30242@upsilon.cc> <CAKTje6G7VTeHeCEuQW6OA+JxvDQnH8rJFWzm57YKnCgcTPazMA@mail.gmail.com> <leficq$cs6$1@ger.gmane.org> <21259.35071.771629.665695@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <CAKTje6FORWLTdPJ7z-WtzFarxQOX0OJZ7628kBWHqnWUQO3GXg@mail.gmail.com> <20140301113748.GA8971@bryant.redmars.org>
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> I think the increasing importance of IRC for people to keep up to date
> on developments in Debian is a bad thing as it excludes people who
> cannot use IRC regularly enough (such as myself). The sheer volume of
> unedited logs will be too much for anyone to realistically digest. Doing
> so would just support the idea if IRC as being essential and further
> marginalise people who don't use it.
The only channels I find have lots of backlog are #debian-devel,
#debian-mentors, #debian-release, #debconf-team and sometimes
#debian-admin. The first one includes a bit of off-topic chatter. The
first two are non-essential and the rest are pretty team specific. For
the others I think most people could probably easily keep up.
I've been wishing I had time to organise people to do a "this week on
IRC" section in DPN, probably hard to find some people though.
Anyway, point taken, there is a lot of volume on IRC.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Reply to: