Russ Allbery wrote: > I think we're still in the middle of our process, which I understand > that a lot of people outside the project find baffling and protracted. Well, not only outside the project. The tech ctte has always operated in the past by coming to a consensus and then voting to satisfy the constitution's procedural requirements. Since the constitutional procedure as applied to the small scope of the ctte is now demonstratably broken in cases where a consensus cannot be reached, why are we waiting around for the full horribleness of it to manifest? I'd be in favor of a GR to fix the constitution to not mandate that the ctte use untested and nonfunctional procedures. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature