Re: Please update the DSA delegation
Lucas Nussbaum writes ("Re: Please update the DSA delegation"):
> On 05/12/13 at 09:35 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > Perhaps it would make sense to first more clearly define problems we want
> > to solve with the whole delegation process, [...]
> This was discussed in
Lucas, I'm concerned that you apparently have time to debate the
merits of our approach to delegates, but unless I'm mistaken you
haven't found time to simply say "yes" to Hector's promotion to a full
member of the DSA team.
Is there some reason (besides lack of DPL team attention, and besides
some wider questions about what exactly the delegation should consist
of) why Hector should not be appointed immediately ? If there is such
a reason please say that you are considering the merits of the
appointment. Otherwise please would you confirm it immediately.
Delaying your confirmation of this appointment is not a way to
strengthen the constitutional process. Rather, it weakens it by
bringing it into disrepute.