Re: ditching the official use logo?
Paul Tagliamonte writes ("Re: ditching the official use logo?"):
> I know this is a borderline slimy argument, and I really (REALLY) don't
> like being on the side of non-free, but I think continuing to assert
> copyright / non-free conditions on the official use logo won't really
> cause much more harm.
Yes. I quite agree.
I think it is entirely right and proper for the Debian Project to have
some logos, names, etc., which represent _approval by the project_.
Obviously such logos cannot possibly serve their purpose and be
Free. Software Freedom includes the freedom to do things without our
But I don't think there is any contradiction here with our principles,
provided that we make sure that the software we ship does not use