Re: ditching the official use logo?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
[ CCing the www mailing list, the thread almost start on project [0] ]
0 : https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2012/10/msg00002.html
Hi,
Le 01/10/2012 06:40, Bart Martens a écrit :
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 12:27:37PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> Note for those who have never looked into this: the "official use" logo
>> is the one with the bottle.
> ....
>> My personal take on it is that we should simply
>> ditch it, focusing on a single logo (the "open use" one) with a
>> DFSG-free license, that we do now have.
>
> I don't object against ditching the logo with the bottle. I don't object
> against keeping it around either. Maybe if people want to keep it around for
> nostalgic reasons it can be kept available on the website as the "former
> official logo" with a nice story about its history or so.
The www.d.o website use to keep online “archive” content, so I guess it
would be fine, but I'm not thrilled by the idea to keep non-free content
online inside our official website, maybe other people will have more
comments. About the “nice story about its history”, proposals will be
welcome ;).
Cheers
David
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)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=VW8i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: