On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 08:00:27AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 03:31:38PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :It seems to me that the third patch has been applied by now, although the referenced SPDX web pages for BSD licenses are empty.Was that deliberate? I feel that it makes the current draft not appropriate for widespread use: as discussed in this subthread there is ambiguity on the exact wording of each BSD variant.Hi Jonas,I am hoping that given SPDX is advancing towards beta release, they will fill these pages in a not too long time. But in the meantime, we could add a link to their license table, if necessary:diff --git a/dep5.mdwn b/dep5.mdwn index 09da1e1..1b217de 100644 --- a/dep5.mdwn +++ b/dep5.mdwn @@ -383,6 +383,9 @@ of that license, the short name is finished with a plus sign. For SPDX compatibility, trailing "dot-zeroes" are considered to be equal to plainer version (e.g., "2.0.0" is considered equal to "2.0" and "2"). +Currently, the full text of the licenses is only available in the +[working version the SPDX license list](http://spdx.org/wiki/working-version-license-list). + [[!table data=""" **keyword** | **meaning**
Yes, I feel that would be helpful indeed - even if known to be temporary.
- Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Description: Digital signature