Re: DEP5: ready for CANDIDATE?
Le Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 03:31:38PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> It seems to me that the third patch has been applied by now,
> although the referenced SPDX web pages for BSD licenses are empty.
> Was that deliberate? I feel that it makes the current draft not
> appropriate for widespread use: as discussed in this subthread there
> is ambiguity on the exact wording of each BSD variant.
I am hoping that given SPDX is advancing towards beta release, they will
fill these pages in a not too long time. But in the meantime, we could
add a link to their license table, if necessary:
diff --git a/dep5.mdwn b/dep5.mdwn
index 09da1e1..1b217de 100644
@@ -383,6 +383,9 @@ of that license, the short name is finished with a plus sign.
For SPDX compatibility, trailing "dot-zeroes" are considered to be equal
to plainer version (e.g., "2.0.0" is considered equal to "2.0" and "2").
+Currently, the full text of the licenses is only available in the
+[working version the SPDX license list](http://spdx.org/wiki/working-version-license-list).
**keyword** | **meaning**
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan