Re: What is annoying in the flattr buttons?
]] Michael Gilbert
| On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:27:08 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
| > You don't think so. I do. One of the reasons is it puts a, IMO too
| > low value on other, similar work, so by taking petty donations for
| > small pieces of work, you are lowering the value of my work too.
| > Lowering the value of the work your codevelopers are doing is, IMO,
| > rude. I realise that's not the intention of asking for money, but
| > the effect is there.
| How can you possibly reduce the monetary value of volunteer work? Or
| more inquisitively, how is it even feasible to assign a price to such
| work in the first place?
I did not write monetary value, I wrote value.
By not assigning a monetary value to the work, it gets valued by its
usefulness (or prettyness or whatever). Once you assign a monetary
value to it, the non-monetary value gets in the background because
people will use the monetary value as a proxy for its non-monetary
Let me make a simile, which like all similes are not perfect, but might
get my point across, since it seems people find it hard to understand:
Assume you are helping a friend move house. They offer you €2 for the
work. Would you be happy? I'd be insulted, since what they're doing is
assigning a very low value on your work, rather than just saying «Thanks
a lot for the help» afterwards. If they just said «Thank you», the
value they put on your work and thereby how appreciated you feel will be
| […] According to your argument, all of Debian's volunteers are doing
| the world a major disservice in actively preventing a potential $13
| billion in revenue from infusing into the economy. How cruel!?
I'm not sure how you got to that conclusion at all. Also, I would
believe a fair amount of the upstream (and Debian) development is done
by people paid to do that work, so surely that number should be
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are