Re: PTS subscription exposure
* Lucas Nussbaum <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2010-03-02 13:24:35 CET]:
> On 02/03/10 at 12:10 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > And it's a vast difference between something that is exposed from the
> > > start to begin with or something that is later adjusted to get exposed
> > > like it wasn't intended to in the first place and thus isn't expected to
> > > be.
> > .... and without proper prior public discussion.
> Discussion is happening, less than 24h after the CGI was implemented.
After is not prior, that's one of the main points.
> So, what do you propose?
Roll back until a decision has happened would be a considerate step to
> There has been the suggestion to send an email from the CGI. Would that
> be acceptable for you?
This still leaves the data stored in UDD, the CGI is only a minor part
of the issue that uses the core point of troubles.