Re: PTS subscription exposure
On 02/03/10 at 12:10 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Gerfried Fuchs (firstname.lastname@example.org) [100302 12:09]:
> > Hi!
> > * Mike Hommey <email@example.com> [2010-03-02 11:47:04 CET]:
> > > On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 11:40:20AM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > > > Alright, let's also expose list subscriptions along the same reasoning.
> > > > Again, this is not your job to judge which lists I would be interested
> > > > in.
> > >
> > > Any subscriber of a mailing list on alioth can see who is subscribed to
> > > the mailing list. This is a default feature of mailman, and has been
> > > such for years. Apparently, noone cared about that "privacy" issue.
> > Erm, since when did alioth lists come into play? You are losing me. The
> > alioth lists have nothing in common with the ones run on
> > lists.debian.org.
> > And it's a vast difference between something that is exposed from the
> > start to begin with or something that is later adjusted to get exposed
> > like it wasn't intended to in the first place and thus isn't expected to
> > be.
> .... and without proper prior public discussion.
Discussion is happening, less than 24h after the CGI was implemented.
So, what do you propose?
There has been the suggestion to send an email from the CGI. Would that
be acceptable for you?