Re: Genericly-named debian.net domains for private use
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08-04-2009 08:23, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Apr 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>
>> + Bernd Zeimetz (Wed, 01 Apr 2009 03:18:33 +0200):
>>
>>> Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:00:46AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>>>>> Wouldn't it be just better to point those domains to the respective
>>>>> project-wide efforts? I'd appreciate opinions on the matter.
>>>> AOL.
>>>> Looks like the rule is quite simple too: for any $X.debian.org,
>>>> $X.debian.net should point to $X.debian.org. (A reasonable exception
>>>> could be www.debian.net containing a list of .debian.net names.)
>>> Implementing this rule would be very appreciated.
>> Adding DSA to the loop to see if this is something they want to
>> standardize or regulate.
>
> That single rule doesn't scale, there are non-abusive users of clashes
> right now (buildd, www), and it wouldn't solve the backports thing.
That means we should try to push the changes in a similar way we
adopt Policy changes, by convincing people or that we should try
to write the rules and publish them (like DMUP) or vote them
(via GR)? :-)
I'm just wondering if we should discuss more about the rules or
if DSA will propose rules for adoption with some "migration
period".
Kind regards,
- --
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
"Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAknc6DQACgkQCjAO0JDlyka+1QCffcRNvKP+r6+G138YzwnlmVRO
hVoAoKensIh6cIjJ1S6UzxNcOOSDHViA
=dEh7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: