Re: Genericly-named debian.net domains for private use (was Re: Point to semi-official backported packages?)
- To: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org>
- Cc: debian-project@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Genericly-named debian.net domains for private use (was Re: Point to semi-official backported packages?)
- From: Bernd Zeimetz <bernd@bzed.de>
- Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 03:18:33 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 49D2C0E9.2050909@bzed.de>
- In-reply-to: <20090328094104.GB13761@usha.takhisis.invalid>
- References: <20090327112801.GA925@straylight.m.ringlet.net> <e13a36b30903272035mb6df916l9f3a28b79465cbf5@mail.gmail.com> <20090328090046.GA25501@chistera.yi.org> <20090328094104.GB13761@usha.takhisis.invalid>
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:00:46AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>> Wouldn’t it be just better to point those domains to the respective
>> project-wide efforts? I’d appreciate opinions on the matter.
>
> AOL.
>
> Looks like the rule is quite simple too: for any $X.debian.org,
> $X.debian.net should point to $X.debian.org. (A reasonable exception
> could be www.debian.net containing a list of .debian.net names.)
Implementing this rule would be very appreciated.
--
Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
GPG Fingerprint: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79
Reply to: