[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Genericly-named debian.net domains for private use (was Re: Point to semi-official backported packages?)



On Wed, 08 Apr 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote:

> + Bernd Zeimetz (Wed, 01 Apr 2009 03:18:33 +0200):
> 
> > Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:00:46AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > >> Wouldn't it be just better to point those domains to the respective
> > >> project-wide efforts? I'd appreciate opinions on the matter.
> 
> > > AOL.
> 
> > > Looks like the rule is quite simple too: for any $X.debian.org,
> > > $X.debian.net should point to $X.debian.org. (A reasonable exception
> > > could be www.debian.net containing a list of .debian.net names.)
> 
> > Implementing this rule would be very appreciated.
> 
> Adding DSA to the loop to see if this is something they want to
> standardize or regulate.

That single rule doesn't scale, there are non-abusive users of clashes
right now (buildd, www), and it wouldn't solve the backports thing.

-- 
                           |  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux **
      Peter Palfrader      | : :' :      The  universal
 http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `'      Operating System
                           |   `-    http://www.debian.org/


Reply to: