[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian and non-free

On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 08:24:52AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Non-free is there just because the free counterparts aren't optimal. Someday
> > these will, and non-free will just disappear from Debian :)
> Non-free is for GNU documentation.

I think we should consider (post-lenny) splitting up non-free in a
couple of sub-categories.  Personally, I'd prefer "fsf-free", but
"non-free-docs" would be just as good, besides "non-free-firmware" and
"non-free" for the rest.


Reply to: