Re: Debian and non-free
Le Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 07:17:45PM +0200, Michael Banck a écrit :
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 08:24:52AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > Non-free is there just because the free counterparts aren't optimal. Someday
> > > these will, and non-free will just disappear from Debian :)
> > Non-free is for GNU documentation.
> I think we should consider (post-lenny) splitting up non-free in a
> couple of sub-categories. Personally, I'd prefer "fsf-free", but
> "non-free-docs" would be just as good, besides "non-free-firmware" and
> "non-free" for the rest.
How about Debtags?
Have a nice day,
Debian Med packaging team,
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan