On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 19:41:06 +0100 MJ Ray wrote: > Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it> wrote: [...] > > Was the discussion held on debian-legal (back in April) > > intentionally left over? > > Yes, it was intentionally left out. It seemed to be discussing > ProposedTrademarkPolicy, which is an option on the poll. I don't think it is actually a discussion *on* ProposedTrademarkPolicy, but rather a discussion *triggered by* ProposedTrademarkPolicy. That is to say: an offspring or variant of ProposedTrademarkPolicy. But it developed in a somewhat different plan, even though not *completely* different... [...] > > Is this poll open to DDs only? > > Or is anyone interested encouraged to participate? > > Open to all. I think this affects all contributors, whether DD or > not, commercial or not. Good to know, I'm drafting my ballot just now... > > Hope that clarifies, Yes, quite so. -- http://frx.netsons.org/doc/nanodocs/testing_workstation_install.html Need to read a Debian testing installation walk-through? ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpDuIkyO7Hkl.pgp
Description: PGP signature