Re: Social committee proposal

To: Debian Project <debian-project@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Social committee proposal
From: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 22:43:06 +0200 (CEST)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.62.0706052239540.2219@wr-linux02>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 46652548.x5y0jzJpMAcVkc97%mjr@phonecoop.coop>
References: <[🔎] 18015.59753.335742.102294@davenant.relativity.greenend.org.uk> <[🔎] 46626731.klcmfXL+OIFaTGyW%mjr@phonecoop.coop> <[🔎] 18019.57711.190063.659379@davenant.relativity.greenend.org.uk> <[🔎] 46652548.x5y0jzJpMAcVkc97%mjr@phonecoop.coop>

On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, MJ Ray wrote:

If the developers elected the five, how could they be fired without a
big shift of opinion?


I'm personally more concerned how to find these five people in the
first place before I think about how I could get rid of them.

Perhaps I'm to naive

          Andreas.

--
http://fam-tille.de

Reply to:

References:
- Social committee proposal
  - From: Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: Social committee proposal
  - From: MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop>
- Re: Social committee proposal
  - From: Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: Social committee proposal
  - From: MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop>

Prev by Date: Re: Range Voting - the simpler better alternative to Condorcet voting
Next by Date: Re: Social Committee proposal text (diff), updated
Previous by thread: Re: Social committee proposal
Next by thread: Re: Social committee proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread