On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 10:39:53AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> So let me make a concrete proposal for a DPL delegation which I hope
> will be adapted and adopted by Sam.
As a general comment I like the idea of having such a committee and
welcome your proposal.
To the details ...
> (5) Decide Its Own Procedure
>
> Provided the decisions are consistent with the above, and
> provided that the Project Leader does not object, the Social
> Committe may decide on:
> (a) its own size,
> (b) its own composition and manner of appointment,
> (c) its own procedures for for decisionmaking, including
> (d) how many of its members are required to agree on
> which kinds of decisions, including
> (e) whether to initially assign and empower a single committee
> member to deal with each enquiry, and of course
> (f) any appeals procedure(s) short of overturn via General
> Resolution, and finally
> (g) any similar matters regarding its own operation.
I think we should mention here as an additional point "how to deal with
conflict of interests", in case that one of the members of the committee
is involved in a matter to be decided upon. Don't know if the TC has
faced similar issues, but I think here is compelling.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
(15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature