Re: Criteria for a successful DPL board
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 02:26:53PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Except for firmware, where we're starting to have some good guidelines on
> what's accepted by Debian, I'm not sure that those discussions are
> completely part of the past.
You're right of course. But my point was more about us having no idea
what will come.
> > I do agree that we eventually should elect all members. But I would go
> > one step further and give every one of these positions a special
> > resposibility, e.g. community relations, marketing, internal
> > organisation, ... and let them elect their chairman themselves.
> Interesting idea. I like the principle but I'm not sure that you'll have
> many candidates for "internal organisation" when it's so more fun to
> work on "public relation". But this needs to be thought further, it could
> be an interesting base.
Well, I would have guessed the other way round if you consider "internal
organisation" to include our servers, network, etc. :-)
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: firstname.lastname@example.org
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!