also sprach Ana Guerrero <ana@ekaia.org> [2006.10.11.1040 +0200]:
> Yeah, but this frustration is not only about be able to upload
> your own packages, this is also about, i.e., have rights to vote
> in the currents GR.
Exactly. So why not work towards a scheme where you can have vote
and private access, but not write access to the archive if not
needed? Contributions like translations and other
package-overarching changes are much better done in a centralised
fashion (see debtags).
But anyway, from a furious discussion on #debian.de I want to make
sure that you don't read my mail as anything other than what it was
supposed to be:
- my own opinion
- not a criticism of NM or a hint that I know how to improve it
- a suggestion to assign more granular rights to people according
to what they need to accomplish their tasks in Debian, not as
a way to reward someone or to separate the full DDs from the
half DDs.
- an expression of my desire to do something about inactive DDs
who all have write rights to the project.
But this has all been discussed.
I shall tend to the etch release now. This is definitely material
for afterwards.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
NP: The Cooper Temple Clause / See This Through And Leave
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)