Re: Proposal: The DFSG do not require source code for data, including firmware
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 12:16:22PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Why would I do that, when you are taking the opposite way? When you
> > believe a commend on a list has no merit, you explicitly ask other
> > people to ignore it, based on a stupid DD/non-DD segregation instead of
> > the merits of the comment.
> This is not my understanding of aj's comment, Josselin. He did not ask
> to *ignore* Peter's comment, but only to remind that, Peter not being
> a DD, the comment can't be told to reflect the DD community opinion.
No, but he blamed Peter for participating in the conversation because he was
not yet a DD. I doubt that any DD's personal opinion here except aj's would be
more representative of the DD community opinion.
> Yes, I'm not completely sure that aj's comment was appropriate but I
> don't put in it the interpretation you seem to put (awful English,
> sorry, folks).
Maybe it is not best for us non-english speaker to comment on the content of
aj's post, but i am happy that i am was not the only reacting to it. Maybe it
is something french people are more sensible too, as both you, me and Josselin
are all french-speakers.