Re: Constitutional Amendment GR: Handling assets for the project
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 23:47:12 -0400, Joe Smith <email@example.com> said:
> That is true. However this ammendment substancially changes the
> section that talks about SPI, so it would be reasonable to have
> SPI's board look at it if they so desire. At best they could find
> some text that ought to be tweeked, and at worst they could have no
As individuals, people who make up the board of SPI can
already put in their input. Officially, the SPI board has no say
here -- as individuals, they have the same rights as everyone else.
> This ammendment is in no real hurry, as it mearlly re-affrims the
> status quo, and tweeks a few related lines.
> Of course it is your ammendment, so it is your decision.
Quite right. The DPL can, of course, extend the minimum
discussion period, under our constitution.
Never eat at a place called Mom's. -- Nelson Algren
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C