Re: Call for a new DPL mediation ... This will be the only thread i will reply to in the next time about this issue.
* Chris Waters (email@example.com) [060621 04:22]:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 05:55:42PM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 05:09:10PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> > > It doesn't matter! The DPL has no authority in the matter!
> > He seems to think he does. At least, he has authority to stop abuse
> > of the mailing lists if he thinks it's happening.
> I meant specifically the matter of SVN access. Obviously the DPL has
> authority over the Debian mailing lists.
> > Do you know for a fact that a majority of the team members
> > are likely to quit, or have threatened to quit, if AJ (or a GR) restores
> > Sven's commit access?
> AJ (or a GR) cannot restore Sven's commit access.
A GR can definitly override any decision, and restore Sven's commit
> I know nothing about the positions of the d-i team or Sven or AJ. I'm
> simply saying that if AJ or the project tried to tell *me* who could
> have access to a repository under *my* control, I would tell them, in
> very specific terms, where to shove it and how fast to spin. :)
If the repository is hold on a debian.org-machine, it is definitly bound
by the rules of our constitution. If you don't like it, don't use debian