On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 10:31:43AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 09:59:19AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Just for clarity, I'm not going to support maintaining a list as part of
> > the constitution; such a list should be outside of it.
> Notice that there was a precedent, in the list of fundation documents, which
> is separate from the constitution. Well, it is a list, but the importance of
> it is different,
Absolutely. The foundation documents could be thought of as extensions
to the Constitution; we want to protect updates to them with a
supermajority as well. The same is not true for organizations to hold
Debian bank accounts, I'd say.
> so i don't know in how far it is applicable here.
How about 'not at all'? ;-)
Fun will now commence
-- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4