On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 07:50:23AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > Anthony, ... > I would like to hear your comment on the possibility to override the need for > NEW for the creation of some new binary package [...] Sven, you bring this up every chance you get, please stop it. You're not interested in comments, you're just hoping that you'll get a different answer to the last dozen times you've brought it up. For those playing along at home, routing around NEW processing isn't going to happen; if you're introducing new packages regularly enough that NEW processing delays are a concern for you, you should reconsider whether whether different package names for different versions of your software are actually a good idea, or work with the ftpmaster and release teams to ensure that your uploads are done in a way which minimises NEW-related delays -- such as not making RC bug fixes dependent on NEW processing. Cheers, aj
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature