Re: Third call for votes for the debian project leader election 2006
On 2006/04/06, at 23:18, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
Also even if -from an outsiders perspective- the jargon used is
strange. I have to wonder:
if one is not even willing to look at the jargon used by the
the projects point of view. Then why on earth would one be applying to
NM-process in the first place? And how on earth would one expect to
the philosyphy and procedures part of the process?
Which is the reason why this whole thread started.
Why is it that active contributors would have to go through all this
to have a right to vote in the Project Leader's election ?
This is what is questioned by people who contribute.
If you dismiss such claims by saying "they just have to wait for 200
days after having contributed for so long in the dark" it is not
going to work.