[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Consultant entries that will be removed unless there is an email address provided



On Sat, 28 May 2005 11:47:50 +0100, MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop> said: 

> Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org (va, manoj)> wrote:
>> Err, perhaps apply some common sense? Does anyone really doubt that
>> the stable release manager is missing? Or is no longer involved in
>> Debian?

> Is the stable release manager still offering debian services and
> wants listing on w.d.o/c?

        Have you asked?

>> Why is there such a stringent requirement for a email address
>> anyway?

> See my other email on this topic for two reasons.

        Your other email on the topic said this:

>>
>> I think it's OK. All it needs is to ask them to review their
>> listing on the web site and send an update in, or report back
>> if it fails. I guess this waits until next week now.

        Which also fails to explain why the Debian  project is
        insisting on a business plan that requires the use of email/

>> Why can't interested parties pone the consultant directly?

> Expense. Why can't consultants send in their email addresses?

	Since they choose to only spend their time dealing with people
 who are either in the area or are committed enough to spend the
 money? Since they do not want to face the Spam? Since when does the
 Project decide to dictate business plans? And why is the project
 discriminating against business plans? Who made this decision?

>> De-listing Joey seems to smack of mindless application of
>> bureaucratic power, in the sheer absence of even a modicum of
>> thought.

> Spitting flamebait about something which hasn't happened seems to
> smack of grandstanding. You could avoid it if you cared.

	Liking a policy, since one has spent eons of time crafting
 one, is to be expected. Defending it it willynilly despite flaws is
 silly. Flaming people pointing them out is idiotic.

        I can't help it if you spent years or months or whatever
 coming up with a policy which, in my opinion, is flawed. The
 time you spent lovingly crafting it is not interesting, fix the
 darned thing already.

        manoj
-- 
It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than forgiveness for
being right.
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C



Reply to: