Re: Keeping discussions secret (Was: GFDL again...)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 20-12-2004 13:58, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Jonas Smedegaard <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2004.12.20.1334 +0100]:
>>What I suggest instead is making it mandatory to include with each
>>private post wether or not your own part of the email (what is not
>>quoted from others, I mean) is private or not, and if it is, why.
> Good idea. Maybe we could make this a properly formatted pseudo
> header and bounce messages to debian-private that do not have it?
> Private: yes
> Reason: because Jonas said so.
Very good idea!
Could someone please help getting this moving? I seem to not get along
well "speaking to the crowd", so me pushing this would probably not
be a good approach.
In other words: Take this on, someone, and I'll support it 100%
 Such is my experience from school group projects and from
discussions at -private and at Skolelinux: my main intend is frequently
misunderstood and my approach seen as "snerring" (if that is the english
word for "grrrr").
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
- Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----