[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Keeping discussions secret (Was: GFDL again...)

also sprach Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> [2004.12.20.1334 +0100]:
> What I suggest instead is making it mandatory to include with each
> private post wether or not your own part of the email (what is not
> quoted from others, I mean) is private or not, and if it is, why.

Good idea. Maybe we could make this a properly formatted pseudo
header and bounce messages to debian-private that do not have it?


Private: yes
Reason: because Jonas said so.


Private: no.

> Such policy would impose on the list awareness of its secret
> nature.


Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: