also sprach Jonas Smedegaard <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2004.12.20.1135 +0100]: > Then a suggestion for the future: Post your reply on -project, and only > mention on -private where your posting is. No. A response needs to establish context, and if only by mentioning the name of the person to whose post your are responding. It may already be considered a breach of privacy to some if it becomes public that they have been involved in a discussion. Moreover, a response usually gives some indication about the original poster's opinion, which is certainly private. > Please respect the openminded intend of our project. Keeping > non-private discussions private is not in the interest of our > users! With that, however, I fully agree. Maybe we should start making it debian-private policy that people should first ask whether a certain topic is better discussed there or on a public list? I am not in favour of having a discussion take place on two mailing lists. It is too easy to leak private information as the discussion gets more involved. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <email@example.com> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
Description: Digital signature