On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 08:16:28AM +0100, Peter Karlsson wrote: > > including the one where Bruce Perens clarified that the DFSG were > > written to apply to everything in debian > > Yeah, I saw that one. This means that we cannot include stuff like > software licenses in Debian, which in turn means that we cannot really > distributed Debian itself. Thus it's a void argument. Here you are committing the fallacy of assuming that there is no difference between data and metadata. [You have also failed to demonstrate that "software licenses" do not comply with the DFSG. I don't think you can, because I don't think you can demonstrate that copyright subsists in them at all, but that's really beside the point] -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature