On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 06:30:20AM +0100, Peter Karlsson wrote: > Simon Law: > > > That's because all these people are using it acceptable. But > > that doesn't mean that our logo is _free software_. For reference, > > please read the debian-legal thread I linked to. > > To me the argument falls flat here before it even starts: the logotype > isn't software, and can't be treated as such, even less than > documentation can be treated as software (which also is quite an absurd > notion). If it is absurd to treat logos and documentation as software, then it is absurd to include them in Debian. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature