Re: Getting rid of section "base" ?
Yann Dirson <email@example.com> writes:
> Goswin Brederlow writes:
> > I don´t like the
> > alphabetic sorting. Its hard to find something you don´t know the
> > exact name of.
> Hm... often "ls */*pattern*" in lftp was needed and sufficient for me
> with current section-based layout. I'm not sure how worse would be
> alphabetic sorting.
That would try to do an ls and stick in to a file called "*/*pattern*"
under dos. Good luck. :) Not everyone has a good ftp programm. I had
this happen to me about a dozent times when using a stupid dos box,
because I´m so used to using patterns.
May the Source be with you.