Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (2013-08-28 12:30:18) > Le 28 août 2013 11:28, "Jonas Smedegaard" <[1]dr@jones.dk> a écrit : >> >> Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (2013-08-28 09:41:53) >>> Without so bump and transition of libcms because abi breakage is >>> subbtle (change of padding on structure...), code will compile fine, >>> function will be called but crash will be at run time. >> >> Thanks for the clarification. Seems irrelevant for me, though, as I >> am working on Debian, where I believe it will be properly taken care >> of, even if possible by hand to do a broken compilation. > > Yes but it means manual so bump whereas upstream keep the old so name > and coordination with release team Still seems irrelevant for me. Let me be more explicit: It sounds like an issue relevant to discuss with the package maintainers of lcms2. This bug is about Ghostscript. Even more specifically, please go read http://bugs.debian.org/701993#27 written by... *you*!?! Why do you bring up this issue well-known to both of us, and insist even after I argue it is irrelevant here? Am I missing something? - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature