[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Ghostscript 9.09 released upstream, Debian on 9.05



Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (2013-08-28 07:32:21)
> Le 25 août 2013 21:10, "Jonas Smedegaard" <[1]dr@jones.dk> a écrit :
>    >
>    > Quoting Till Kamppeter (2013-08-25 20:35:55)
>    > > On 08/25/2013 08:16 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>    > > > Quoting Till Kamppeter (2013-08-23 14:02:03)
>    > > >> GS 9.09 builds (at least under Ubuntu) with all libraries 
>    > > >> taken from the system, no convenience code is used any more. 
>    > > >> But I do not know whether all of these libraries are 
>    > > >> actually available in Debian or whether there are some being 
>    > > >> newer in Ubuntu than in Debian or not in Debian at all, as I 
>    > > >> did not package these libraries for Ubuntu.
>    > > >>
>    > > >> I have packages GS 9.09 for Ubuntu with a ~dfsg source 
>    > > >> tarball not containing any of the convenience library code 
>    > > >> copies. There are also no source code patches (only some 
>    > > >> build system patches which most probably are known to you).
>    > > >>
>    > > >> You can find the package and the source tarball for 
>    > > >> backmerging to Debian on
>    > > >>
>    > > >> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/9.09~dfsg-0ubuntu1
>    > > >
>    > > > You write above that Ghostscript 9.09 builds on Ubuntu.
>    > > >
>    > > > I am quite interested in learning which versions of libraries 
>    > > > you have succesfully build against, but fail to locate 
>    > > > _succesful_ build logs from Ubuntu (but found a few failing 
>    > > > ones - missing build-dependency).
>    > > >
>    > > > Could you perhaps provide me a URL to a succesful build log?
>    > >
>    > > I have built it on my local machine running a fully up-to-date 
>    > > Saucy. The build server is not able to build it because the 
>    > > libopenjpeg package is not in Ubuntu Main, but only in 
>    > > Universe. It is in the process to be transferred to Main, but 
>    > > this takes longer than expected.
>    >
>    > Yes, I am aware of the libopenjpeg issue.  Specifically I was 
>    > curious about the verison of liblcms2-dev, but might have 
>    > interest also in other dependencies - that's why I generally 
>    > asked for a build log.
> 
>    For libcms breakage is abi not api so build log could succeed but 
>    result will be interesting without so bump and transition

Sorry, I don't follow wht you are saying above.  Please elaborate.

 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: signature


Reply to: