Re: Please test xkb-data 0.8-12exp2 in experimental

[Denis Barbier <barbier@linuxfr.org>]

On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 07:11:20PM +0000, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> Hello Denis,
> 
> Denis Barbier <barbier@linuxfr.org> wrote:
> > xkb-data 0.8-12exp2 is in experimental.
> >
> > This version will be pushed ustream, so please test it and report
> > problems.  After that, we will discuss modifiers and default settings.
> > Thanks.
> 
> The package works for me. But I miss the power key at the top of the
> keyboard. This is the power key:
> 
> KeyPress event, serial 27, synthetic NO, window 0xc00001,
>     root 0x44, subw 0x0, time 3238923114, (485,311), root:(512,384),
>     state 0x0, keycode 222 (keysym 0x0, NoSymbol), same_screen YES,
>     XLookupString gives 0 bytes: 
>     XmbLookupString gives 0 bytes: 
>     XFilterEvent returns: False
> 
> KeyRelease event, serial 30, synthetic NO, window 0xc00001,
>     root 0x44, subw 0x0, time 3238923263, (485,311), root:(512,384),
>     state 0x0, keycode 222 (keysym 0x0, NoSymbol), same_screen YES,
>     XLookupString gives 0 bytes: 

Ok, I will add it.

> And I found this messages on the console:
> The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
> > Warning:          Multiple names for keycode 182
> >                   Using <FK13>, ignoring <K5D>
> > Warning:          Key name <FK13> assigned to multiple keys
> >                   Using 182, ignoring 118
> > Warning:          Multiple names for keycode 183
> >                   Using <FK14>, ignoring <K5E>
> > Warning:          Key name <FK14> assigned to multiple keys
> >                   Using 183, ignoring 119
> > Warning:          Multiple names for keycode 184
> >                   Using <FK15>, ignoring <K5F>
> > Warning:          Key name <FK15> assigned to multiple keys
> >                   Using 184, ignoring 120
> > Warning:          Multiple names for keycode 157
> >                   Using <KPEQ>, ignoring <K59>
> > Warning:          Key name <KPEQ> assigned to multiple keys
> >                   Using 157, ignoring 126

Those 4 keys are indeed redefined in
  /usr/share/X11/xkb/keycodes/macintosh
I do not know yet why.

> expected keysym, got XF86AudioEject: line 2244 of inet
> > Warning:          Type "ONE_LEVEL" has 1 levels, but <RALT> has 2 symbols
> >                   Ignoring extra symbols
> Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server

These warnings are "normal'.

> Why is Fn+6 num_lock?

No idea, please run
  xkbcomp :0
and send the generated file server-0.xkb.

Denis