Re: DRI probably broken: where to reportbug
Thanks a lot for answering.
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 02:12:06PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-05-27 at 01:38 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> > On an updated unstable Debian, PB5,8, X only starts now with
> > Load "dri"
> > disabled in xorg.conf. What's the Debian package that is responsible
> > for the broken (?) dri driver: libgl1-mesa-dri? I've Version 6.4.1-0.4
> > installed.
> libgl1-mesa-dri is only involved when you run an OpenGL app. The culprit
> here is most likely xserver-xorg-video-ati,
Oh, I already filed a bug report some hours ago against
> but it's a known problem anyway. It should work with radeon DRM 1.23
> or newer.
I'm not sure what you mean by DRM 1.23: But a just a few days old
relatively fresh git kernel here says this in kern.log (when
rebooting after the mentioned crash probably --> the wrong 'Jan 1' date):
Jan 1 01:00:53 debby1-6 kernel: Inspecting /boot/System.map-2.6.17-rc3-gf358166a-dirty
Jan 1 01:00:53 debby1-6 kernel: Loaded 19106 symbols from
[ ... ]
Jan 1 01:12:08 debby1-6 kernel: [ 715.607451] [drm] Initialized drm 1.0.1 20051102
Jan 1 01:12:08 debby1-6 kernel: [ 715.640230] [drm] Initialized radeon 1.24.0 20060225 on minor 0
Does the above mean that this kernel still has drm 1.0.1 ?
Or is it old xorg stuff that is being loaded at the time of the
$ zgrep DRM /proc/config.gz
# CONFIG_DRM_TDFX is not set
# CONFIG_DRM_R128 is not set
# CONFIG_DRM_MGA is not set
# CONFIG_DRM_SIS is not set
# CONFIG_DRM_VIA is not set
# CONFIG_DRM_SAVAGE is not set
So I'm not even sure what was going on when the system crashed: Were
the kernel DRM modules from above loaded, or some DRM from xorg?
Actually I'd bet now they were part of an xorg package ... :) Because the
sources for the running kernel, in drivers/char/drm/radeon_drv.h, say
* 1.24- Add general-purpose packet for manipulating scratch registers (r300)
But I can only guess ... :)
> The only way to
> 'fix' it will be to disable the DRI with an older DRM anyway, so this is
> basically a case of 'don't do that' for now.
> > If I don't disable dri on that machine it can damage the system:
> > After one crash that happened an hour ago when I tried to start KDM,
> > time on reboot was reset to something like Jan 1, 2004, IIRC.
> I think you mean 1904.
Yes and No :)
No: I really thought I saw some date of 2004 when rebooting. I was
wondering about that as I was used to see something like 1904 in
situations like that.
Yes: After having a look to my log files I'm
not sure of that anymore, as one kdm.log clearly has one line with that:
(==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Fri Jan 1 01:12:07 1904
Thanks in anticipation
Wolfgang Pfeiffer: /ICQ: 286585973/ + + + /AIM: crashinglinux/
Key ID: E3037113