Re: installing sarge
> Daniel R. Killoran,Ph.D. wrote:
> 2) It automatically configures the network using DHCP, which i would
> rather NOT do, and
When I used the old installer, you had the choice to specify dhcp or a
static IP. I'm surprised this option was removed ...
> 3) the partitioning step should warn you to use ext2 for the root if
> you want to use quik,
> 4) alas, quik doesn't boot it after installation.
> it goes into a loop in which:
> a) it prints some stuff about addresses, which is gone before I
> can read it (it looks the same as the stuff I get when I
> b) It then displays the "pregnant penguin", and right under it
> a rather colourful prompt block
> c) this display lasts a looong time, during which it does not
> respond to kbd or mouse
> d) then it reboots, chime included.
When I tried to use quik a while (~5 yrs or so) ago, it was not stable
on my configuration (8500), but I would guess that with subsequent work,
that has improved. What I would suggest is that whatever method you are
using to boot either into a linux installation, or into an installed
linux system (at least on PPC), boot with the "No Video Driver" option
(in BootX) or fbdev video driver (in quik).
I have not had console support for my ATI video card, or my on-board
video since the 2.2 kernel series. If I try to boot with a video driver
with a 2.4 kernel, the system panics on bootup. No video driver allows
the boot process to continue, but with minimal console video speed. If
you try a 2.6 kernel, the results are a little worse (at least from my
limited trying). With "No video", the system will boot, but you get no
console video at all, and if you try to use a kernel video driver for
the console, the system again panics and you'll have to reboot.