[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: PowerMac 7100/80 won't boot



On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 23:44:58 -0500, Derrik Pates composed:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 04:36:06AM +0000, simon@nuit.ca wrote:

> As I said in my e-mail previously, he has a choice of 3 boot loaders for
> Linux on a NuBus system, though not all bootloaders work equally well on
> all NuBus systems (as I noted, the 6100 _only_ likes MKLinux Booter,
> hangs with all others). Don't know about if BootX or miBoot will work on
> the 7100, but I'd go for BootX for simplicity - Apple's MKLinux booter
> is not a model of "happy-fun-pointy-clicky" GUI-ness, in fact most of
> its settings are in a _text file_. This didn't bother me, but this poor
> guy barely knows Linux at all - getting a distro like Debian on a
> well-supported NewWorld can be occasionally trying. Installing it on a
> NuBus system can be a bear. (Besides the fact that the kernel is at best
> sporadically maintained for them.)

yeh no kidding. and an OldWorld PCI box is somewhat in bewteen i guess:
more b0rken OF, and yaboot doesn't work on them (yet). and i can quite
understand the rather abrupt change of interface/OS coming straight from
macos into debian, heh (the ride's been great so far :D).

simon

> -- 
> Derrik Pates
> dpates@dsdk12.net
> dpates@voxel.net
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 

-- 
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
|UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are.|
*-----------------------------------------------------------------*
| ,''`.   http://www.debian.org/  | http://www.nuit.ca/           |
| : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux        | http://simonraven.nuit.ca/    |
| `. `'                           | simon@nuit.ca                 |
|  `-                             | PGP key: 3744 810B 50F5 187E  |
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*



Reply to: