On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 02:08:04PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > Nope, reiserfsck does (or rather should do? ;) the same as e2fsck does. > > The log replay at mount time just replays the last few transactions, which > doesn't guarantee consistency of the filesystem. exactly > Yep, that's one of the major reasons why I switched to it from ext2. That and > no fsck at boot. :) you should fsck it very often, so you know sooner whether its silently destroying your data or not (see debian-user). but as said, reiserfsck is totally broken so you don't notice the data corruption until things start failing obscurly or you find the contents of /bin/ls inside xfreedriver.c (again see debian-user). > > Now i guess i could have run ext2 in sync also to achieve the same result. > > > Maybe, but that would be very sloooow... or use a journalling filesystem that has a fsck that works. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
Attachment:
pgpxBxz_8lH2E.pgp
Description: PGP signature