On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 05:32:36PM +0200, Andreas Wüst wrote: > OK, I now see why they are outdated, but I would not consider this as an > excuse to not set up a page with proper, current, up-to-date information about > supported models, and which distro/boot-floppies would be best to start with > (just like sloopy suggested doing with some piece of software, which would also be > nice). such a thing would really have to be on penguinppc > This to help newbies/potentials who are interested in Debian and are looking > for information about their model. I think it would be the wrong way to just > point them to the install-manual (which of course is great, and does also have > to have up-to-date model information), so model related > info about support or known problems could be pooled and linked directly from > the ports main page. Just like the way its done now, but distro independent. > > This would ease the evaluation process of potentials a lot. anyone who wants to properly maintain such a document should contact me about getting an account on penguinppc.org. (Chris?) as for getting a link on the ports page, i suppose you have to talk to debian-www about that, getting debian pages updated seems to have been a somewhat slow process at the very least, which is one major reason why i don't think we should bother trying to keep such a hardware list there. besides the fact that a distro indepenent one is probably possible and would make more sense. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
Attachment:
pgppEM8FLz6Ny.pgp
Description: PGP signature