On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 01:06:06AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 09:55:32AM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > > Apparently Mail-Followup-To isn't a standard header... > > http://lists.ximian.com/archives/public/evolution-hackers/2001-February/002104.html > > > > And it means different things for different mailers (if at all). > > Doesn't make much sense to implement a feature that a mailer and > > their brother might break. > > I'll let Branden take this one. Unfortunately (?), it is all too easy to rebut. The author of the above referenced message, which says that both Mail-Followup-To and Mail-Copies-To should be totally ignored, is "Jamie Zawinski <jwz@jwz.org>". That should be a strong enough argument for doing the opposite for anyone. -- G. Branden Robinson | Optimists believe we live in the Debian GNU/Linux | best of all possible worlds. branden@debian.org | Pessimists are afraid the optimists http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | are right.
Attachment:
pgp0aUJfPZhYW.pgp
Description: PGP signature