On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 05:49:07PM -0600, Jason E. Stewart wrote: > "Ethan Benson" <erbenson@alaska.net> writes: > > > it sounds to me like you want a more reliable filesystem, for this > > purpose you do NOT want reiserfs yet. i would stick with ext2 which > > is a very mature, stable and reliable filesystem NOW. > > And you get to wait for fsck forever and ever and ever and ever and .. at least ext2 HAS a fsck. when your reiserfs partition gets corrupted what do you do? journalling != corruption proof. really this `but you have to wait for fsck when you pull the plug' whine is getting really old. > I have no investment one or the other. What about XFS makes more > sense? it has far greater filesystem/file size abilities then reiser. it also appears to be faster in many/most aspects. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
Attachment:
pgpYpKQoTeVzS.pgp
Description: PGP signature