Re: ReiserFS on blank hard drive

[jason@openinformatics.com (Jason E. Stewart)]

"Ethan Benson" <erbenson@alaska.net> writes:

> it sounds to me like you want a more reliable filesystem, for this
> purpose you do NOT want reiserfs yet.  i would stick with ext2 which
> is a very mature, stable and reliable filesystem NOW.  

And you get to wait for fsck forever and ever and ever and ever and ..

> wait for Reiserfs to grow up a bit more.  you may actually be more
> interested in XFS in a bit then in reiserfs.  XFS actually makes
> more sense from the huge filesystem/disk size angle anyway.

I have no investment one or the other. What about XFS makes more
sense?

jas.