Re: Recommendation against UFS

To: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Recommendation *against* UFS
From: Gerd Knorr <kraxel@debian.org>
Date: 27 Mar 2001 08:40:18 GMT
Message-id: <slrn9c0kfi.qu.kraxel@bogomips.masq.in-berlin.de>
References: <v03102801b6e0ae16b3eb@[199.164.144.10]> <v03102801b6e0ae16b3eb@[199.164.144.10]> <985405231.17911.0.camel@spectrolite> <v03102800b6e5e85a3504@[199.164.144.10]> <20010326221655.O841@plato.local.lan>

> > After playing around with my now triple booting (debian/osx/classic) PBG4
> > for a couple hours, and discovering that
> >=20
> > a) osx was slow b) airport was broken c) classic was broken
> 
> there is a technote regarding classic, you must first copy it to the
> macos partition, run it from there, and tehn you can delete it.  then
> it will function correctly. =20

There is something else.  /me has two partitions: one HFS standard with
classic, one ufs with osx.  The classic applications within osx don't
work.

  Gerd

-- 
Man muß die Software wacker hüten
weil in der Welt die Hacker wüten

Reply to:

References:
- Re: X probs after upgrade
  - From: Wilhelm *Rafial* Fitzpatrick <rafial@well.com>
- Re: X probs after upgrade
  - From: Tuomas Kuosmanen <tigert@ximian.com>
- Recommendation *against* UFS
  - From: Wilhelm *Rafial* Fitzpatrick <rafial@well.com>
- Re: Recommendation *against* UFS
  - From: Ethan Benson <erbenson@alaska.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Recommendation *against* UFS
Next by Date: Apple Titanium G4 success
Previous by thread: Re: Recommendation *against* UFS
Next by thread: Bugs report
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: Recommendation *against* UFS

Re: Recommendation against UFS