debian-policy May 2016 by author

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

---

Bálint Réczey

• PIE + bindnow for Stretch?(Re: Time to reevaluate the cost of -fPIC?) May 15
• Re: PIE + bindnow for Stretch?(Re: Time to reevaluate the cost of -fPIC?) May 28
• Re: PIE + bindnow for Stretch?(Re: Time to reevaluate the cost of -fPIC?) May 15

Afif Elghraoui

• Bug#825047: developers-reference: Lintian contradicts suggestion in maintainer scripts best practices May 23

Andreas Beckmann

• Bug#823910: debian-policy: document Build-Depends-Arch/Build-Conflicts-Arch and when it's safe to use them May 10

Andrey Rahmatullin

• Re: package versions with snapshots/branch updates (was: Re: Accepted gcc-5 5.3.1-21 (source) into unstable) May 28
• Re: package versions with snapshots/branch updates (was: Re: Accepted gcc-5 5.3.1-21 (source) into unstable) May 29

Antoine Beaupré

• Bug#824038: PGP keyring maintenance is unclear about further references and updates May 11

Bastien Roucaries

• Re: PIE + bindnow for Stretch?(Re: Time to reevaluate the cost of -fPIC?) May 17

Ben Finney

• Bug#823584: [PATCH] Correct top-level directory name in repackaged tarballs May 06

Chris Leick

• [developers-reference] branch master updated (0414ca8 -> 5393ab0) May 04
• [developers-reference] 01/01: changed »Paketverfolgung« to »Paketverfolgungssystem« May 04
• [developers-reference] branch master updated (ded4668 -> 0414ca8) May 03

Debian Bug Tracking System

• Processed: Re: Bug#823766: firefox: alternative for /usr/share/applications/x-www-browser.desktop May 08
• Processed: Re: Bug#823324: override: libperl5.22:libs/standard May 03
• Processed: block 822753 with 208010 May 09
• Processed: submitter 649530 May 13

Dimitri John Ledkov

• Re: Time to reevaluate the cost of -fPIC? May 15
• Re: PIE + bindnow for Stretch?(Re: Time to reevaluate the cost of -fPIC?) May 15

Guillem Jover

• Re: PIE + bindnow for Stretch?(Re: Time to reevaluate the cost of -fPIC?) May 18
• Re: PIE + bindnow for Stretch?(Re: Time to reevaluate the cost of -fPIC?) May 18
• Bug#823256: debian-policy: Update maintscript arguments with dpkg >= 1.18.5 May 02

Henrique de Moraes Holschuh

• Bug#823584: [PATCH] Correct top-level directory name in repackaged tarballs May 07

Holger Levsen

• [developers-reference] 01/01: rephrase to be less inviting to send private mails (instead of using established channels) May 10
• [developers-reference] branch master updated (5393ab0 -> 9bb10f0) May 10

Iustin Pop

• Re: PIE + bindnow for Stretch?(Re: Time to reevaluate the cost of -fPIC?) May 15

Jakub Wilk

• Bug#823910: debian-policy: document Build-Depends-Arch/Build-Conflicts-Arch and when it's safe to use them May 10
• Bug#823584: [PATCH] Correct top-level directory name in repackaged tarballs May 06

jean-christophe manciot

• Version number of a package providing virtual packages May 06

Josh Triplett

• Time to reevaluate the cost of -fPIC? May 03
• Bug#823348: Limit the strongest dependencies on supplemental -doc packages May 03
• Re: Time to reevaluate the cost of -fPIC? May 03

Marco d'Itri

• Re: Time to reevaluate the cost of -fPIC? May 04

Matthias Klose

• Re: Time to reevaluate the cost of -fPIC? May 03
• Re: PIE + bindnow for Stretch?(Re: Time to reevaluate the cost of -fPIC?) May 17

Mike Hommey

• Re: Bug#823766: firefox: alternative for /usr/share/applications/x-www-browser.desktop May 08

Niels Thykier

• Re: Time to reevaluate the cost of -fPIC? May 14
• Re: PIE + bindnow for Stretch?(Re: Time to reevaluate the cost of -fPIC?) May 15

Paul Gevers

• Re: package versions with snapshots/branch updates May 30

Pierangelo Mancusi

• Bug#807742: developer-reference: Italian Translation May 12

Rene Engelhard

• Re: package versions with snapshots/branch updates (was: Re: Accepted gcc-5 5.3.1-21 (source) into unstable) May 28
• package versions with snapshots/branch updates (was: Re: Accepted gcc-5 5.3.1-21 (source) into unstable) May 28
• Re: package versions with snapshots/branch updates (was: Re: Accepted gcc-5 5.3.1-21 (source) into unstable) May 30

Santiago Vila

• Bug#824495: debian-policy: Source packages "can" declare relationships May 16

Simon McVittie

• Re: Bug#823584: [PATCH] Correct top-level directory name in repackaged tarballs May 07

Stefan

• Bug#824922: debian-policy: d/copyright examples give dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique lintian warning May 21

Tormod Volden

• Bug#823584: [PATCH] Correct top-level directory name in repackaged tarballs May 06
• Bug#823584: [PATCH] Correct top-level directory name in repackaged tarballs May 06

Ximin Luo

• Bug#649530: [copyright-format] clearer definitions and more consistent License: stanza specification May 13

[previous month]

[first page]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[last page]

[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]